I don’t think the organizational capacity exists to be a threat to law enforcement or local or state government.

If there were, I suspect attitudes of the military toward domestic deployment would change.

If, for example, militias succeeded at kidnapping plots against several state governors like the michigan plot against slotkin. Anything that could cridibly be labeled civil war would invite intervention by the military.

Basically there is a huge hill to climb to get to something that could be called a civil war that seems deeply implausible.

Sure, but only paralysis or a split of the US military would leave the result in doubt. There just isn’t any group or organization with the capacity to rival the military, or even law enforcement really.

Absolutely

What do you think voters should do about that?

That’s possible, but the US doesn’t have the institutional capacity for civil war. I think that while the possibility of violence is high, actual civil conflict is low.

Hard to get worked up of this when the competition is trying to enact a new halocaust and only failing due to incompetence.

I wish you the best.

Why are you telling me, a voter this? What am I supposed to do with that information?

That information for for democrat electeds and their consultants.

Voters decide among the options presented. They don’t decide how the campaigns are run. Are you suggesting I start a new political party?

finally, a real fucking take.

If you want to lay down and die that’s your perogative.

The rest is self righteousness.

SCoTUS has neither a military nor a law enforcement arm. With enough political will there is nothing they can do to stop court reform.

There is not. Bill Clinton won the presidency with something like 42% of the vote in 1992.

Neither Trump Nor Bush won more than 50% of the vote to secure their first term in office.

Why is that relevant? To the concentration camps and death squads we are dealing with today?