

13·
1 day agoSomeone says “you (insert arbitrary outgroup) should not exist/be here” is not violent? They say it repeatedly and organize events around this to spread the mindset and you call it not violent? They should be allowed to express their opinion until it becomes tangible and problematic for said outgroup?
…naaah man, fuck that…
Also that twat called for it, wtf is wrong with those nutjobs. From the article:
As a crowd gathered behind him, he said: ‘All of you who throw water are cowards. You don’t actually want to fight for what you believe in.’ One responded: ‘I’ll fight you, b****’, before telling Moffitt to get a job.
Has quite some “guns are no problem, prove me wrong” and getting shot vibes.
I see your point about my argument being lacking. There is a reason I dont like such discussions, I am not very good at or patient enough for them.
But, I also just disagree with the sentiment of basically unconditional “free speech”. If there is clear bad faith behind there gotta be consequences, not just waiting for the law. And yes, before you write another wall, I also agree this is a problematic line of thinking