• Lemming6969@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    12 days ago

    Wouldn’t it be much more effective to develop a laser deactivation protocol than physically taking them?

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      12 days ago

      More effective? No. Less likely to get caught? Yes.

      If you leave the device in place and just laser the sensor, you’re leaving a device that can log passing device info that still works. It can’t record license plates, but it can see that a person walked/drove past.

      On the other hand, if you blind it, then steal it while it’s properly faraday caged, you can let it sit and die for a couple days till it’s safe to dismantle.

      • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        You sure the loss of functionality and cost to repair wouldn’t be devastating to the company? I don’t think it’s feasible to disassemble them en masse.

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 days ago

          If the type of damage gets standardized like that, it makes it much easier to repair in the long run.

          And even if they can’t, the devices still record info as long as they are running. They won’t be able to take images but all other functionality will work.

    • Etterra@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      You’d have better luck with a paintball gun. You’d be well out of its visual range and you could just pepper the lens with paint. I mean it’s not perfect but you’re way less likely to get caught.