Andromeda@beehaw.org to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 19 days agoRulebeehaw.orgimagemessage-square5linkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageRulebeehaw.orgAndromeda@beehaw.org to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 19 days agomessage-square5linkfedilink
minus-squareSophienomenal@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-218 days agoIt would be limn→∞Σnk=0(½k) = 2, actually. EDIT: More clear image of the equation provided below. Alternative form of the same series: In fact, it can be proven that the following is true for any value n: Thus:
minus-squareRedjard@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·18 days ago PS: using i as a loop parameter in math makes me uncomfortable
minus-squareSophienomenal@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-218 days agoOh, I can fix this rq. Just have to generate some new images. “i” is pretty standard for series notation, so that’s why I used it. I could switch to “k” though I guess. EDIT: Updated images
It would be limn→∞Σnk=0(½k) = 2, actually.
EDIT: More clear image of the equation provided below.
Alternative form of the same series:
In fact, it can be proven that the following is true for any value n:
Thus:
PS: using i as a loop parameter in math makes me uncomfortable
Oh, I can fix this rq. Just have to generate some new images. “i” is pretty standard for series notation, so that’s why I used it. I could switch to “k” though I guess.
EDIT: Updated images