• mushroommunk@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    The intent of the post, sure. Women and men are equally capable of anything.

    But absolutely nobody creating sewing patterns is sitting down and going “alright the integral of e to the x dx is…” Or remembering their laplace transformations.

    • Melobol@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I love over-complicating things… but Calculus in a sewing pattern sounds really strange.
      Unless… it is like for a space suit where you need to be accurate? Or making something for a form fitting hard surface?

    • Seleni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Of course they don’t mean women pull out a calculator, a notebook, and start doing calculations, anymore than when a person throws a ball at a target they pull out some graph paper and start calculating parabolic arcs and all that shit. They’re saying we do it instinctively, and if we’re good at doing it instinctively then we can do it intellectually.

    • pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m not saying I couldn’t see cases where I would seriously consider using calculus in a sewing pattern, but it’s really not used in sewing pattern creation basically ever unless someone already knows it and has a very specific use case. I suspect the OP meant “calculations” or something similar and mis-typed.

      Source: I still remember a fair amount of calculus and I sew

    • Draconic NEO@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      And even when computers started to come around, data entry was still largely female dominated. It wasn’t until late ron that it became a male dominated space. Largely due to the takeover of video games, which were in America heavily marketed towards only boys and not often marketed towards girls.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    honestly, drawing patterns only uses “calculus” and “trig” because those are the arbitrary names given to the thought processes that blend the proper melding of mind to motion

  • psud@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    In my town the fact girls were worse than boys at maths was addressed, education of girls was improved

    Now girls are better than boys at maths and no one seems to care

  • wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Whenever I hear someone slopping that “adage” out, I silently note that they’ve no idea how many of the Apollo astronauts were able to return to Earth safely. (It rhymes with “female mathematicians”, btw.)

  • applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    whats really funny to me is people make this claim, but any good study that looks for differences finds none or that women are very slightly better at math and spatial reasoning

  • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    The origins of computer programming are also intertwined with textiles, as the first punch card programs emerged as part of weaving in the early 1800s (Jacquard looms).

    Also interesting: trans people in addition to cis women are historically associated with textile production in many cultures. Trans programmer socks = modern day trans weaver.