• Nednarb44@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I thought we went over this with fiskar. Having solar on a car seems mostly gimmicky, since the amount it generates per unit area is fairly negligible compared to what vehicles need to move. Unless the car is hyper efficient, I can’t imagine the claimed gains on range are actually real.

    • budget_biochemist@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The vehicle is not designed to be a “disco taxi” (rapid transport to and from hospital) but as a mobile medical facility to support remote areas that don’t have reliable electricity.

      The solar panels also provide power while the vehicle is at its destination, charging batteries and providing power for the equipment. It makes a lot more sense for a vehicle that is stationary a lot of the time and working in remote areas without charging facilities to have its own panels.

      • Nednarb44@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        This is a fair point. Having it stationary often, and for long periods helps its case. The range increase is basically an tiny side benefit.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      A gentle reminder that you should actually read the article before responding instead of just the headline.

      Unless you have other suggestions for long-range ambulances that can power medical equipment in remote parts of Africa?

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        A gentle reminder that you should actually read the article before responding instead of just the headline

        First time on Lemmy?