In my opinion:
Meshtastic is MUCH easier to set up. Reticulum is very difficult to set up and requires a lot of time/work at the moment.
Reticulum has a lot of potential for more protocols, networking, apps, etc…
Meshtatic is very much made for messages and finding nodes.
Both work with LoRa.
Ive played around with both and was more successful with meshtastic (and meshcore). But Reticulum impressed me because I could send images over LoRa and could work with just about any networking. Which was interesting!
This is a good video showcasing RNode/Reticulum here: https://youtu.be/BsAMeMp1hlg?t=657



Looks like Reticulum is no longer being developed (creator essentially made it read only) and there’s no active forks.
It’s still being actively developed. There’s been multiple releases in just the last few weeks and all through the year. He’s just not posting immediately to github as he’s built-in git support over the reticulum network [0] and it seems that’s his primary way of releasing source updates.
Once you have
rnsinstalled [1] (and configured to connect to the broader network) you can run the following command to get the latest source files:# From the 1.3.4 release notes [0] rngit release rns://7649a50d84610232d1416b41d2896aff/reticulum/reticulum fetch latest:all --signer bc7291552be7a58f361522990465165cThat said, rns is mostly feature complete. Now its up to others to built tools/apps on top of the network. For anyone not aware, here’s some apps/tools to try/check out:
Lastly, for anyone still reading, there’s a few ports being developed that are compatible with the python implementation:
[0] https://github.com/markqvist/Reticulum/releases/tag/1.3.4
[1] https://pypi.org/project/rns/