He is right that people are being exploited somewhere along the chain, but surely the answer is to stop supermarkets making billions in profits rather than making food in an already struggling nation more expensive?

  • Euergetes [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    kim-salute another polanski banger qin-shi-huangdi-fireball unlimited prices on the first world

    real talk though UK discourse on supermarket prices and operations is a heap of the most deranged talking points ever, even less hinged than US where there’s enough “naïvete” people come to normal conclusions like price controls and nationalisation. Aldi’s PR team did real good convincing all the talking heads to talk about specific prices instead of availability and wages (though i think that’s what polanski’s remarks were trying to convey)

  • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Grocery prices are a total of shipping and handling, packaging and cooling, farm labor and store labor, and business profits. Below a certain point, there’s no way the workers are earning

    Ultimately, the price of food is an indirect social relation of how much one person’s time can be bought by another person.

    The solution to food affordability is price ceilings, public assistance, state-run groceries, universal access to allotments, or some combination of these. Prioritizing low prices feeds in to the capitalists’ framing.

    In the very next paragraphs Polanski is quoted in support of free school meals and a £15 minimum wage. He’s not saying affordability is a bad thing, but that this market-mediated instance of it shows a need for change.