A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 days agoEven animals are tired of the slave catcherslemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square22linkfedilinkarrow-up1308arrow-down13
arrow-up1305arrow-down1imageEven animals are tired of the slave catcherslemmy.dbzer0.comA404@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 days agomessage-square22linkfedilink
minus-squarevrek@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 days agoNo, I realize it’s a parrot. There is either an extra and or an extra that.
minus-squareElgenzay@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 days agoThey mean that grammatically, if you read it as a label, it works because “This is …” Is implied, and thus corrects the grammar
minus-squarevrek@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agoMaybe but doesn’t requiring a pair of implied words still mean it’s bad English?
minus-squareSatyrSack@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agoIt’s “headline English”, not “conversational English”. In context, it works.
minus-squareElgenzay@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 days agoYeah I’m not defending it, it’s bad. But i see what the other commenter is saying
minus-squarevrek@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 days agoYeah, I understood what it said but had to read it a few times. Plus so far I’ve seen 3 responses on how to fix it so it’s not impossible to catch I editing…
No, I realize it’s a parrot. There is either an extra and or an extra that.
They mean that grammatically, if you read it as a label, it works because “This is …” Is implied, and thus corrects the grammar
Maybe but doesn’t requiring a pair of implied words still mean it’s bad English?
It’s “headline English”, not “conversational English”. In context, it works.
Yeah I’m not defending it, it’s bad. But i see what the other commenter is saying
Yeah, I understood what it said but had to read it a few times. Plus so far I’ve seen 3 responses on how to fix it so it’s not impossible to catch I editing…