• null@piefed.nullspace.lolBannedBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The mental gymnastics people need to do to feel better about getting something for free against the wishes of the creator is so wild.

    Just own it.

    • maddie1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      My favorite is people who use “archival purposes” as an argument for having a dump of some shit like SMB + Duck Hunt cart for NES. That shit isn’t going anywhere man, you just want to play it for free and that’s ok.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, “the wishes of the creator” don’t matter. They don’t get to dictate how people use an idea they’ve shared, no matter how elaborate. If they want to keep it private, then don’t share it.

    • nimpnin@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Surely, as in most modern games, the creators exact wishes is that nobody will be able to play it in a few years

    • Mothra@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not always against the wishes of the creators. It’s certainly against the wishes of whoever is making money out of it, and fair enough this is sometimes the creator but more often than not we are talking about a middleman, such as a publisher or big entertainment company.

      When I see piracy is depriving the creator of revenue directly, it always feels bad to me.

      When I see the creatives have been paid already, or have several income streams (and big ones at that too) and the only ones deprived of profit are the middleman companies… Well…