• VinegarChunks@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          16 hours ago

          With a lot of things:

          You start off with no knowledge, and it’s a big mystery.

          You gain some knowledge and feel like you have understanding.

          You gain a lot more knowledge and you learn how much more there is that isn’t known.

          The President is either at stage 1 or stage 3, take your pick.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            No he’s at stage 0. He has no knowledge but he doesn’t investigate he just makes things up and then says that.

            We’re talking about the person who thought that stealth planes were physically invisible.

      • pmk@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Whenever I think about magnets I remember this Feynman interview where someone asks him why magnets behave the way they do, and he says that to answer a “why”-question you need a foundation where something is agreed to be true, and it seems like for electromagnetic forces we end up in " because that’s how the universe is apparently".

        • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Sure, but between nothing and the axioms of the standard model we end up with a fairly comprehensive description which can predict how different kinds of magnets behave in a wide variety of situations.

            • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              17 hours ago

              No, the theory of electromagnetism and by extension physics in general is knowing how it works. How to use it is engineering, a different set of knowledge which we also have some of.

          • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            14 hours ago

            This seems to be easily said of anyone trying to popularize science philosophy.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            That is sort of how the universe operates though. You can have a greater and greater understanding of the underlying principles of physics but eventually you do get to “that just how it is”. Why is there no such thing as a negative photon, apparently we just can’t have a negative excitation in the photon field, no one knows why.