Do you mind to explain the truth nuke contained in this post, because I think I’m a little lost. When I cast my critical gaze at this here’s what I see:

1. A strawman construction of a liberal
2. “I have depicted you as the enraged soyjack therefor I have won”
3. A position that is not in alignment of the liberals I encounter (demand all genocides match the world’s first industrial genocide in Germany 80 years ago, not at all aware of what a Uiyghur is, unfamiliar with the term “Holodomor”)
4. A seeming form of genocide denial when it comes to the ethnic cleansing occuring in the gobi desert and a man-made famine (I’m somewhat willing to hear discussions about whether or not the holodomor was the result of active ethnic cleansing or of the asymmetrical information sharing that occurs in authoritarian regimes given Stalin’s advisors’ fear of him, however denials that it happened and was the result of policy positions are out of touch with reality)
5. A poster who frequently refers to what you refer to as “the fraternal war between Russia and Ukraine, triggered by Russian aggression” as “Liberation” with the alleged liberating army being the Russian Armed Forces

We’ve been getting along better of late after a friend let me know you had amended some of how you were treating fascists and anarchists, so I’m positive I must just be missing something because my understanding hews much more closely to @[email protected] 's interpretation that we as socialists of many flavors is to resist all genocides, not matter who the victims or the perpetrators are, be those victims Palestinian, Latin American, or Sudanese, or those perpetrators the united states, ruzzia, or the modern hypercapitalist china