• curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    6 days ago

    Redhat is just part of IBM now, so even more baggage on top.

    Yet another reason I’ve been a Debian user for so long.

      • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 days ago

        No company behind it, the DSC/DFSG has been around for around 30 years now, its operated through the non-profit SPI for just as long, and important to note it was Bruce Perens who made the first draft of the DSC.

        I think the drama in Debian has historically been more on the geekery side than anything else, and should continue to be the case for a looooong time.

      • wylinka@szmer.info
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        This is not as bad, but…

        There’s a package in Debian called “fortune-mod” that contains “offensive jokes” - racism, homophobia, misogyny etc. They refused to remove it because free speech or whatever.

        • drkt@scribe.disroot.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 days ago

          If the package is not malware, I actually would prefer the repo maintainers fight to keep it there. I do not want the software repo to be censored. If I don’t like a piece of software, I can avoid using it.

          The package is not shipped with Debian. The package is not shown to a user anywhere in Debian. A user has to go out of their way to acquire the package.