infrastructure pls

      • Blep [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I went and checked the numbers. Metrolinx runs on about $2B, of which $800M comes from fares. I cant find a number but i dont think they spend that much on transit cops

        • EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Sorry, I was being glib, but the costs of fare collection and enforcement overall typically result in the revenue being essentially nothing. I lived in a Metropolitan Statistical Area in the US which determined about 20 years ago that it had been actually losing money on fare collection for their various transit systems and decided to just do nothing about it.

        • none [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          My understanding is that there are many costs associated with collecting fares, beyond the wages of the enforcement cops. In most (all?) places, the majority of fare revenue just go back to paying for fare collection. Only 20-40% is actual profit.

          If transit was free, so many more people would use it, so you can collectivize the loss of profit from taxes and everyone is bettter off. Except for all the people who were employed in the fare collection complex. They will need new jobs.

          Fare collection on public transit is an ideological, not financial, necessity.

  • dkr567 [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Would be nice if they actually joined the 21st century (or rather 20th century) and electrify the fucking go train lines instead of doing more pointless shit but that’s just standard Metrolinx.