

They’re very contrarian. Also it helps that since they’re huge libertarians they hate the CIA (though maybe more for reasons of wasteful spending than because it’s a terrorist organization).
░░░░░███████ ]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ 💣💣💣💣
☻/ ▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂
/▌ Il███████████████████].
/ \ ◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤..


They’re very contrarian. Also it helps that since they’re huge libertarians they hate the CIA (though maybe more for reasons of wasteful spending than because it’s a terrorist organization).


AJ
If any ‘resistance axis’ member attacked expect a response: Iran official
Iran’s attack on Israel in defence of Lebanon isn’t merely a military response but an “official declaration of a strategic doctrine”, says the head of Iran’s expediency discernment council.
Amoli Larijani said the strikes are a “clear message” that should any part of the “axis of resistance” – which includes Hezbollah – be attacked it will be met with a “response transcending geographical borders” and “alter the regional equations”.
“At the same time, Iran made it evident that any escalation of the conflict or assault on the country’s critical infrastructure would face a comprehensive and deterrent response – one whose scope could encompass all actors supporting this confrontation,” said Larijani.
“Thus, Tehran has ushered in a new chapter in its defence policy – a chapter in which safeguarding regional power is pursued not in anticipation of threats, but through proactive initiative and offensive strength.”
I think she should’ve just left it at the Hague bit. The rest just lays it on too thick.