Lasherz

The readers who would be rightfully shocked if a mainstream website, especially without a leading “Opinion:”, talked anything like you do about something they’ve been complicit in this whole time.

I support the same cause, you’re just making us look bad. You’re given full freedom to say your peace in the body of the post, you could even post: Truer headline: “zionazis etc.” Your* indignant denial of the rules followed by accusations of a detestable ideology being the defining feature of the removal reads like a cry-bully.

I would have given you temp bans a lot more than you got on that com, but the way you’re acting it would have ended up in the exact same place.

Edit: word

I wonder how many removals and warnings they had before the ban for rampant editorializing

Oh…

Nah must be your “anti-zionism” not the rules you flagrantly broke.

Edit: I count 28 violations of rule 1.

It’s closer to 64% https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2026/04/07/negative-views-of-israel-netanyahu-continue-to-rise-among-americans-especially-young-people/

Ironically evangelicals are now more favorable of the ethnostate of Israel than the supposed benefactors. “Supposed” because it’s trivial to see Jewish folk are not made safer by the existence of Israel.

Still, this supposes that a majority opinion gives carte blanche to antisemitic dog whistles about supposed dual loyalty, etc. It’s shameful to lump in some folks who are vehemently opposed to the genocide as willing participants. The polling mostly has just shown that people who get their news from zionist networks tend to be more zionist, but even then over time that dam is breaking. Unfortunately the media environment and powers that be provide an outsized influence compared to reality on the ground in a place the people polled don’t live.