Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agoDefensive Votinglocklemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square426linkfedilinkarrow-up1696arrow-down158
arrow-up1638arrow-down1imageDefensive Votinglocklemmy.blahaj.zoneUriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square426linkfedilink
minus-squareprole@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down6·2 days agoNot in the same way that the inverse is true, no
minus-squareFishFace@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·2 days agoMathematically it’s the exact same situation but flipped.
minus-squareprole@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down4·2 days agoThis isn’t pure math, it’s electoral politics. Because the third parties in question this time (and most times) were spoiler candidates for the Democrats, a Republican abstaining does not necessarily mean +1 for Dems
Not in the same way that the inverse is true, no
Mathematically it’s the exact same situation but flipped.
This isn’t pure math, it’s electoral politics.
Because the third parties in question this time (and most times) were spoiler candidates for the Democrats, a Republican abstaining does not necessarily mean +1 for Dems