Anarchy in theory is great and it is fairly obvious for small societies but it’s complicated for me to imagine how a a functional anarchist society would work with more people.
It would need very proactive and trustworthy people. Anyways I want to know how you all think of solving these problems.
The penalty system. I mean like what now is judges, cops, lawyers. I am guessing there will still be laws? I mean who would decide those anyways and if there were no laws ig it would be case specific. I guess people could do that without needing cops and if you get enough people you cpuld also find a system for that instead of laws
Military forces. I mean like an anarchist country could already be a target. So like if you have no defenses you disappear eventually and if that happens what was the point of having an anarchist country. And then like who is keeping all the weapons and stuff. I mean it could technically just once again be a non-for-profit and people who wqnt to fight just fight.
And some person just trying to take the power while getting people join to them. Even if they don’t get control a lot of people could die.
Like Idk maybe I am missing something or I’m dumb, well I am but like fkdjmed I was saying like all of these would need proactive, trustworthy, dedicated and good people. But I don’t think that’s the mayority of people, maybe I may be wrong but idk. Besides from a lot of people being agaonst the whole idea in the first place making it vey hard or almpst impoasible to mantain.
I still wanna hear what you all think of this ans other possible problems that you know of to like clear things up a little more for me, ty!
Yes… that’s why I am asking… I think I nentioned or implied that or I tried to. I am half sure I literally said I was dumb somewhere.
Some people would kill you for things others would praise you for, but yea moral compass stuff and that.
Also did you just also include communism? I didn’t really ask for that one and I don’t think I needed it but thanks for the effort.
Anyways yea you kinda make some good points and explained the stuff mostly even if you exagerated a bit in some places kinda but I get the point.
WHAT WAS THAT FOR‽ Like it was a geniuine question thanks for the help but if it is offensive or something you probs should not answer it anyways- But sorry I guess, I should’ve probably just searched it up.
They’re afraid they’ll have to come up with an actual plan. Attacking you is just an attempt to make them look better, it’s basically ‘couch revolutionism’. There’s likely no intention for you to even read any of it. It’s all for them.
Anarchy is a power void, there is no collective defense against private militias or half the country annexing itself and picking their own government, or just being wiped out by a neighbor that isn’t an anarchy. Who’s to stop them? Everyone? What if they don’t want to? It’s their right, after-all.
“You can’t organize your own militia outside of the anarchy!”
“You can’t just dip out on a war! We’re under attack!”
lmao, a stalinist
I addressed most of what you said in my comment. Others have written books on the topic. All of which, especially my upthread comment, are very available for you to read if you weren’t afraid of being told you are wrong.