I got banned for telling the guy posting Tucker Carlson on “Progressive Politics” that he’s a chickenshit coward because he couldn’t give a reason why he’s platforming Nazi shit and instead deflecting to a hundred other topics.
I’m not mad that I got banned, I was very rude to the guy, but it is pretty gross that they’re still promoting a reactionary white supremacist as “progressive politics.” I reported the post to the mod and got banned instead.
Oh well, that place has a history of hosting that kind of garbage anyway. No big loss.
Resorting to ad hominem attacks when you lose an argument is not the winning move.
Oh, and I already told you this in another comment when you “didn’t say that Tucker Carlson is a progressive”:
Your argument is full of logical flaws, and now you’ve started to repeat yourself. I guess I have to start reminding you of the mistakes you already made in your argument
I said that his stand on Israel is the only progressive stand he has and said in other and had multiple comment talking about how dangerous his other ideas are . I am sorry but someone who selectively read what he want to make the other person look bad is idiotic . There is only a problem with ad hominem attacks when it is not followed by real arguments.
just because you equivocated a few time doesn’t change your continued characterization, and I’m not to blame for the clear flaws in your argument, nor how they make you look.
as for “real arguments”, all I’ve done is point out the flaws in yours.
with examples