

Another idiot who selectively read my comment. I never said Tucker is progressive.


Another idiot who selectively read my comment. I never said Tucker is progressive.


Do you realize that conquering mean military occupation or colonization?


Evengelicals are supporting iarael with hste speech against palestinians and lobbying neither are prohibited by the first amendment.


You have to abolish the first amendment to do it.


What your solution against evengelical nazis?


It doesn’t but it does benefit palestinians by trying to convince evengelical that support for israel colonialism is not christians and not beneficial for them


Israel is explicitly talking about exterminating Palestinians. It is a very low bar to minimize the situation


There is more chance of evengelicals to be convinced to stop supporting Israel by someone like him then other type of people. Keeping associating his supermasism to his stand against Israel jas opposed wanted effect. While exposing his supermasism in isolated manner is beneficials to fight his supermasism ideology


So post article and video about Tucker supermasism


I am not going to defend his supermasism and his promotion of dangerous ideas


No. His stand for palestine is progressive. Everything else is not.


I am not saying that he is a progressive. Just saying his opposition to the genocide is. I think we should still condemn him when he say supermasist things


deleted by creator


Hitler commites the worst genocide in history. Tucker didn’t


Opposing all aids to a colonial power is progressive which he does. I agree that everything else he promote is terrible and dangerous


Anti colonization is progessive.


Omnivory is completely natural. You seem to have a problem with nature.


Extremism is always bad even for noble causes


A zionist in america not involved in the genocidal actions you mentionned do not deserve to die. Those involved is valid since they are terrorists
I said that his stand on Israel is the only progressive stand he has and said in other and had multiple comment talking about how dangerous his other ideas are . I am sorry but someone who selectively read what he want to make the other person look bad is idiotic . There is only a problem with ad hominem attacks when it is not followed by real arguments.