I submit for your judgement, my ban from a History Photos, after the mod (a favourite around here) loses his cool and breaks almost all the sub rules and the instance general guidelines.

Arguably he also breached instance rule 1 against ableist conduct and use of slurs as the history of the word moron is quite troubled - something I’ve disagreed with @[email protected] on before.

https://piefed.social/rules

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moron_(psychology)

For clarity I do not support any of the states identified by the US as rogue states. Discussing motives and outcomes does not equal support.

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Foster a continuous learning environment.
  4. No genocide or atrocity denialism.
  5. Photos MUST be at LEAST 10 years old, and ideally over 20. We appreciate that we are living through events which will become history, but this is ultimately not a comm for news or current affairs, but events which have occurred some time in the past.

https://piefed.social/comment/11787117

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Alright.

    This is definitely PTB. PJ broke his own rules. You can’t do that as a mod, period. Doesn’t matter what the provocation is.

    Mind you, you were a smug jerk as well (edit: and I mean that both of you were being smug jerks), so the only reason it’s PTB is that he crossed the line. I might have temp banned your ass a few exchanges previous at the most. Probably, I would have just reminded you to chill the fuck out and disengaged, but I dunno, I can be a hotheaded asshole sometimes.

    If it had been temporary, I’d have gone with an ESH since both of you were slap fighting instead of talking, but that’s not what happened.

  • redrum@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    All PugJesus moderated forums are a cyclejerk of apology of liberalism, imperialism and USA.

    I don’t understand why people want to participate there.

    • redrum@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      Repling to my self to clarify it:

      • PTB
      • but for an iberal/imperialist/crypto-fascist instance or community, YDI.

      Comms and instances should add to their rules tab their ideological bias. It’s a pitty that only communists and anarchists instances/comms are enough honest to do it.

  • Sneezycat@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    5 days ago

    PTB.
    I don’t know who’s in the right history-wise, and I appreciate pugjesus’ posts and explanations.
    But in this case it feels to me like it was just an interesting argument until he decided to call you a dipshit and a moron (and then ban you). Smh.

    • Cypher@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      This probably isn’t the community for it but as I was banned for ‘conspiracy theories’ I figure its relevant.

      The US has been quite open about its involvement in Libya and there are plenty of sources on this

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_involvement_in_the_2011_Libyan_Civil_War

      https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/IF/PDF/IF11556/IF11556.33.pdf

      Over a decade after a 2011 uprising and U.S.-backed military intervention that toppled longtime authoritarian leader Muammar al Gadhafi

      Congress has conditionally appropriated funding for transition support, stabilization, security assistance, and humanitarian programs for Libya since 2011

      The idea it could be a conspiracy theory that the US backed rebels against Gadhafi is beyond ridiculous, it was public, acknlowedged at all levels of the US government and is a matter of factual record that assistance including military and humanitarian spending. These actions were undertaken largely under the umbrella of a NATO intervention.

      Stating the fact that this happened isn’t condeming or condoning (though ousting Gadhafi was good, the fallout and subsequent rise of ISIS in the region was horrific) it is literally just the recognition of events as they happened.

      https://www.nato.int/en/what-we-do/operations-and-missions/nato-and-libya-february-october-2011

      https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-13908202

      • mrdown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        The start of the revolt was genuine but there is not a single doubt that the US was involved in destroying Libya. France was even more involved, it was france who brought the idea in UN to be involved under pretext of protecting civilians . Still this is a PTB

      • gnufuu@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        4 days ago

        Keep the comments in YPTB posts about the moderation action itself, not about the general topic in which the moderation took place.

        Thought you might appreciate this quote from this comm’s rules since you’re so outspoken about following them.

        • Cypher@aussie.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          This probably isn’t the community for it but as I was banned for ‘conspiracy theories’ I figure its relevant.

          Right at the top of the post buddy. Going to follow the rules yet?

            • Cypher@aussie.zoneOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              It is relevant to directly refuting the reason for the ban as stated in the mod log.

              Got any more bangers there champ?

              • gnufuu@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                4 days ago

                My bad, I could have sworn your comment was

                about the general topic in which the moderation took place

                and not

                about the moderation action itself

  • quill7513@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’m going to weigh in that this is a case of PTB even if, as some others you could have been more graceful. The role of a moderator is primarily to prevent things from spinning out of control like they did here.

    That particular mod left his old home instance after realizing it had some problems, and was acting better for a while, but has been returning to many of his old ways. In particular:

    1. He has been getting less and less respectful and inclusive
    2. He has not been open minded, which is required for a learning environment
    3. He has a eurocentric perspective on genocide and atrocity that ignores that even though pre-colonial societies were not perfect, the current state of the world is a very direct result of an attitude that any one society is more advanced/developed than the others they encounter
    • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      He has a eurocentric perspective on genocide and atrocity

      dude thinks readsettlers.org is a melodramatic screed filled with anti-white “racial prejudice”, JonsJava concurs and permabanned me immediately for linking it and I will bring it up every chance I get

      • JonsJava@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Care to share the user?

        I don’t agree with your take.

        I do believe it’s not news, or unbiased, so I can see why I might have, but it wouldn’t be ban-able, so I’d like to know the user to refresh my memory.

          • JonsJava@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            I re-reviewed all the details, and came to a very confusing realization

            • This has been 11 months, so I have pretty much no memory of the ban
            • I did this at 5:23 in the morning
            • I reference a temp ban that never happened
            • it was on a thread that was full of rule violations (https://a.lemmy.world/lemmy.world/post/32467169)

            With all that in mind, the only conclusion I can come to is I fucked up. I must have misread a mod queue report as someone else, and banned you for their actions.

            I can unban you if you like, but if you hate me and the communities I moderate and don’t want that, that’s also your choice.

            • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              I mean I would like an unban as I think it’s completely unfair. The previous ban that was referenced was my lemm.ee account which I had switched away from since the instance had shut down. Here is my recollection of the events at the time of the original ban: https://lemmy.ml/post/19362644

              Also I don’t hate you or anyone really, I just had run out of good faith with the lemmy.world mod team in general and after you reaffirmed the ban in our last discussion without actually pointing out what you thought was racist with you as well. Glad to be proven wrong on that account though.

    • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      This is how pj has always been though? And for leaving it didn’t seem like it wad from issues as much as pj wanted to own the tankie devs by moving to software done exponentially even worse people

  • Wren@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    One of the most unhinged, incendiary and often super wrong people on here. They’re practically a mascot for bad mods, a leech that clung to the foot of a reddit exodus.

    Good on you for trying to bring respectful discussion into their com, but you might as well have been delivering top sirloin to a seagull.

    • Cypher@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      For context, until the 1960s, the terms moronidiotcretin, and imbecilewere all genuine, non-offensive terms used, including by psychiatrists, to refer to people with mental/intellectual disabilities and low intelligence. These words were discontinued in that form when concerns arose that they had developed negative meanings, with “removed” and “removeded” replacing them.

      Welcome to the euphemism treadmill

      • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m aware. I’ve even posted articles on that topic before. But current day usage of those terms generally no longer refers to mental issues, the horse has definitely left the barn on that issue.

        • Cypher@aussie.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          Uh huh. So how long before you deem removed acceptable?

          There are people still alive who were diagnosed with those terms and who undoubtedly had them used as ableist slurs against them.

          Once you’re on the treadmill there’s no hopping off

          And I’m not perfect. I’ve used moron as an insult occasionally

  • gnufuu@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    Arguably he also breached instance rule 1 against ableist conduct and use of slurs as the history of the word moron is quite troubled

    This you?

    The fact that you’ve been throwing around that very same word makes me think you’re simply looking for drama.

    • Cypher@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yes but please do read and follow this subs rules, I’d hate to see you banned ;)