Firmware Flashing is Riskier on Linux - Lemmy.World
lemmy.world
Most Linux firmware tools (flashrom, coreboot utilities, vendor‑reverse‑engineered scripts, NVMe tools) load the firmware into ram (assume it’s ECC), trust the RAM is correct, and write directly to SPI/EC/NVME. There’s no double-buffering, memory integrity checks, vendor-grade validation, protected memory regions, or automatic rollback. If the buffer is corrupted, Linux flashes it anyway. Windows OEM flashers never trust raw RAM blindly. Because vendors don’t ship Linux flashers, users rely on flashrom, fwupd (reverse‑engineered metadata), Community EC flashers, Community NVMe firmware tools, and Coreboot scripts. Reverse‑engineering = incomplete understanding = higher brick risk. Windows uses official vendor tools with signed capsules, verified update paths, vendor QA, and recovery logic. Linux gives userspace access to /dev/mem /dev/spidev I²C/SMBus EC registers and PCI config space which is terrible for safety. Windows blocks almost all of this.

It’s sorrowful some people choose to hate, complain, ridicule, and block everything that does not fit their choice…

With just a single idea shared, a lone message posted in a community, with your finite priceless time and experience invested, you may get banned instantly, and permanently, instead of actually learning and discover together…

The single message that resulted in my immediate permanent ban:

Message

It’s not Linux, but your distribution, or you, what makes it “unsafe”.
There are numerous options to harden your Linux environment, and it’s relatively trivial to keep it safer if you ever want it, or actually stop blaming and complaining.

For example, to limit the access for root or custom group hwaccess, without much fuss but to give you an idea, for the most popular distros as Debian-based:

  1. Add a Udev rule:
# /etc/udev/rules.d/90-hwaccess.rules

KERNEL=="mem",        GROUP="hwaccess", MODE="0660"
SUBSYSTEM=="spidev",  GROUP="hwaccess", MODE="0660"
SUBSYSTEM=="i2c-dev", GROUP="hwaccess", MODE="0660"
  1. Set at boot:
setfacl -Rm 'g:hwaccess:rwX' -- \
    /sys/kernel/debug/ec \
    /sys/bus/pci/devices/*/config;

You may then setup SELinux, AppArmor, and secure it via SecureBoot’s shim, too.
Yet, you chose to effortlessly complain instead…

  • Broadfern@lemmy.worldEnglish
    24·
    7 days ago

    You broke the comm’s rules:

    Rules:

    1. FOSS (especially GPL) advocates and Linux (specifically GNU/Linux) evangelists aren’t welcome (GNU Hurd will count as Linux). -We ask that you block us and we will perma-ban for violations of this rule.

    That is entirely on you.

    • csolisr@hub.azkware.net
      3·
      3 days ago

      I wonder, what will happen when the mods of the community realize their server doesn’t use FreeBSD or something? Self-termination?

    • Artwork@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      52·
      7 days ago

      Oh… I see… Thank you!
      I could not even imagine such a rule when I noticed the post at home page of LemmyWorld instance, and commented on it… ^^"

  • limer@lemmy.ml
    141·
    7 days ago

    Ydi, you spoke reason in a troll community that has rules that any tech savvy person could see as a danger sign.

    Don’t feed the trolls

    • madthumbs@lemmy.worldEnglish
      13·
      3 days ago

      Reason? Do you see this advice on noob or help communities for Linux? Is it actually honest? (no) You all go around preaching and evangelizing, then blaming the user when they fail and it doesn’t live up to your grand endorsements.

  • Harvey656@lemmy.world
    7·
    7 days ago

    Linux gives userspace access to /dev/mem /dev/spidev I²C/SMBus EC registers and PCI config space which is terrible for safety.

    I might be ignorant, but isnt that information technically different per distro?

      • Harvey656@lemmy.world
        51·
        7 days ago

        There’s been a ton of antis recently spreading straight up misinformation.

        Saw one recently saying anticheats dont work on linux because the apps can’t run root. Which is massively wrong. Weirdos.

        • A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          6·
          7 days ago

          just wait until they find out that you have to literally use a exploit to load your own kernel drivers on windows

  • frongt@lemmy.zip
    51·
    7 days ago

    Yeah I mean technically PTB, but it’s a community specifically for that, so what did you expect?

  • csolisr@hub.azkware.net
    31·
    7 days ago

    Do they happen to have the same moderators as the subreddit? Because they’re also famous for being trigger-happy with the ban-hammer