• Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Idk, I’ve developed a system to determine how much i can trust each individual.

    Over time i observe the behavioral patterns of an individual to somewhat determine what’s their strong side or what interests they have. Based on that i can figure out how much i can trust them and with what tasks.

    If it’s something they’re good at/interested in and they have something to gain from it and the overall mistake rate is low. I can trust them fully.

    Now if it’s something they’re not that interested in, theres nothing to gain from it and they have a high mistake rate. Then i cant really trust them with said task.

    Of course it’s not full proof, anomalies/surprises can happen, but those shouldn’t be taken into account due to very low chance of happening.

        • cockmushroom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          In a way I think it’s more negative. As in you often expect that a person you trust cannot/wouldn’t do things, particularly if they harm you or your interests. The “cannot” side leads closer to dependence, again⁺ imo, but overall you’d also be more vulnerable than someone who’s merely willing to benefit from asking for a favour.