It’s not that shocking given that all birds have feathers, and almost no dinosaur fossils had feathers until fairly recently (and they’re still rare as I understand it).
The connection was made in the 19th century, it just didn’t become mainstream until the 60s.
And pet peeve: “birds are dinosaurs” is only true cladistically speaking, but ordinary English is not cladistic. There is such a thing as a fish and anyone who says there isn’t can fuck off.
Honestly shocking that we didn’t discover that birds \subseteq dinosaurs until recently
It’s not that shocking given that all birds have feathers, and almost no dinosaur fossils had feathers until fairly recently (and they’re still rare as I understand it).
The connection was made in the 19th century, it just didn’t become mainstream until the 60s.
And pet peeve: “birds are dinosaurs” is only true cladistically speaking, but ordinary English is not cladistic. There is such a thing as a fish and anyone who says there isn’t can fuck off.
“\subseteq”?
⊆
LaTeX way of writing “is a subset of”
Neat, but, I have to admit, completely incomprehensible to the uninitiated 😅
Perfect, half of the sentences I say in real life are similarly indecipherable 😎 this is the #authentic #me