• inspxtr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    24 days ago

    people are suffering, but it’s more important that the line is not increasing, peasants!

  • psycotica0@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    23 days ago

    Wait wait wait, you’re telling me all the money that was gained not fixing problems was short-sighted? You’re telling me there’s downsides?

    Why haven’t people been talking about this for 20 years!!!

  • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    23 days ago

    Didn’t some economist joker get a Nobel prize for saying the climate disaster wouldn’t cause much economic harm?

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 days ago

      He did. By assuming that damage was proportional to the fraction of the economy that a given sector represents. Which is an ok representation at very small amounts of warming. But when temperatures rise, the fact that the agriculture sector was, say, 3% of the economy, doesn’t mean that damage is only 3% when the amount of food goes to zero.