Mar a lago is within drone range of Cuba

I said a few weeks ago that the helicopters were vulnerable to the shahed drones. Several people claimed the drones would just be shot down by the helicopter before getting close but clearly not.

both are safe and uninjured

I don’t think I’ve ever heard of anyone surviving when these helicopters get shot down.

They’ll still run recon targeting flights while sanctioning them. While continuing to be an active participant they will use it as a tool to lie that they are doing something to the population of the UK that overwhelmingly opposes Israel now.

No update on Peru in a little while so here’s the current situation. 95.685 % counted

50.074 % ROBERTO HELBERT SANCHEZ PALOMINO

49.926 % KEIKO SOFIA FUJIMORI HIGUCHI

Surprisingly fair and informed analysis to be honest. All of his points are true. The only problem here is that’s not a bad thing.

If power coops can generate more than they need then they could aggressively expand by swallowing up whole neighbourhoods on the basis of being able to provide power at a lower cost than the grid.

If you can work out a model for it you could even take on new clients and offload the infrastructure cost to banks via loans to buy more panels for each participant. The coop essentially providing all the panels to a new participant on the guarantee of them staying in the coop for x amount of time. This isn’t even a loss if things go wrongly because the coop still owns all the panels even if a participant runs off or breaks contract or something.

Yeah what MIT is actually saying here is that because solar creation is too efficient it is actually creating an economic situation in which switching to solar costs more than the profit that would be made from it.

That wouldn’t be an issue if they just allowed Chinese solar panels but without Chinese production it’s an economic issue with capitalism.

Remember to leave them treats under their pillow

They have a hard-line on China that results in a lot of reasonable people being banned. You can’t even have a nuanced position like supporting them as a socialist state but believing they need to do more international support. I got permabanned there for arguing that very position with someone.

lmao this is pretty evil but also very funny

It’s the location that it hit that strikes me as intentional. If it was yeeted in a random direction it’s not likely that it would land perfectly on a building. It’s more likely it would land on nothing, a road, a field, a hill, some woods, or even just partially on a building and surrounding road/car parks. Hitting a building cleanly and not any of these other scenarios is very likely to be intentional.

The issue is that drones are still preventing armour from being useful and conventional small arms battles are just trench warfare so lines barely move at all. As long as they have small arms ammunition and drones, there is never going to be a significant progression of the line.