The show is actually about backlash to gender and sexual minorities. The main character is the subject of a hate crime (That’s not a spoiler, that’s shown in the first 10 seconds of the show) and the show is the lead up to that, as we see what leads up to that hate crime. And the thing is, through this we see a lot of criticism of respectability politics. The main character consistently pursues respectability politics in his dealings with bigots, he makes remarks about how modern queers are too out there, and he is shown to be in the wrong for doing so, and when he says that as an older gay man he’s “Paid his dues” and he can just be normal now, he is mocked to his face and told that his very existence as an out gay man is inherently political.

But it is also very obviously written by an older successful cis gay man, and brings with it the associated brainworms.

It absolutely tries to do a thing about the “excesses” of the gays, although I will say that the thesis is not that these things are wrong, but that they will provoke the bigots and that could have negative consequences. A sort of reverse pride. Shame?
Either way, whenever a character is shown to be against LGBTQ people for such excesses, they are wrong in the story (Well, except for the TERF, she just gets to say shit). The main character for instance makes a remark about trans people being what draws bigot’s attention, and is immediately shut down for it and later makes a speech to a bigot defending both self ID and being trans/gender noncomforming.

I consider myself midgormed

The worst part is that you don’t make soup with gold bullion

busposting

It seems improbable that a plurality or at least close to a plurality of tbe Peruvian diaspora is rich and white . I also know it isn’t true for the Turkish diaspora and those guys love Erdogan

You are without gorm. Your gorm levels? 0

Isn’t the origin of that just the Chinese word for tea? I feel like of all the words to loan from China, their word for tea makes a lot of sense to steal.

I will never understand hardline rightists in a diaspora community. Especially when theyre not exiles.

100% of the participants (5) produced liquid sourced from the bladder when squirting. There really isn’t anything inconclusive there.
If you go into systemic reviews like so https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23634659/ squirt is also shown to be urine in the examined literature.

Again, there are fluids involved in the vaginal/vulval sexual experience that are not in any way urine. Including the skene’s gland producing what we call ejaculate, but “Squirting” is urine. If you are referring to anything but squirting you are correct.

author’s note: it is not actually pee

In the case of “squirting” it leaves the body through the urethra and is composed almost entirely of urine sourced from the bladder.

While there may be involvement from skene’s gland, calling it pee is absolutely factually true.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36000809/

There are a lot of other fluids involved in vaginal/vulval sexual stimulation, and those are not pee. If you are referring to those, then you’re right.