Talking about Contrapoints's bad history take on Marie Antoinette and why its wrong.My socials:Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/c/SpookySocialist Twitter: ht...
Yup. People do the same for Hasan. He constantly says things that ragebait people so they do way weirder unrelated things like pretend he’s a dog torturer.
You’re just implying that pro-palestinian people are transphobes, even more so than zionists. Which is just very strange.
It absolutely does. If the slop-posting of other e-celebs by other communities is not due to transphobia, but anti-zionist people posting her Islamophobic rants is…
I have literally been told itt that being a transphobe is ok as long as you are anti-genocide (specifically, anti-genocide but still pro zionism like Finkelstein).
You could stop responding. Would be better at this point, honestly. You’re already making up strawmen like “you claim that anti-genocide people are transphobes” when nobody said anything like that anywhere. I brought up the example to prove that yes, we do have transmisogynists like @[email protected] on here and they go mask off every time you poke them a little.
My point isn’t to defend Natalie’s takes on Gaza, not only because they are indefensible but because her position on the genocide isn’t even the topic of this thread, it wasn’t the topic of the last contrapoints hate thread three days ago either, it is barely ever brought up in spite of the fact that we collectively tear into her twice a week. My point is that the excessive focus on her is a symptom of hexbears’ transmisogyny problem that nobody except the trans women on this site is ever willing to adress. Stop making up excuses for what is obviously transmisogyny, stop telling trans women that we cannot tell it’s transmisogyny.
You even go out of your way and say “this is the same as people making up lies about Hasan’s dog.” You openly admit that this has reached the point of character assassination where it doesn’t even matter anymore if an accusation is completely fabricated. and where the original problem that made somebody an acceptable target is now only trotted out as a flimsy after-the-fact justification. How am i supposed to treat somebody who thinks that kind of behavior is not only normal, but perfectly acceptable?
Hexbear has a serious casual transphobia problem. This isn’t even the only time it’s happened in the past couple of months, there was all the denial of Lilly Bushnell’s gender as well. Claiming that someone’s transphobia is acceptable just because they oppose genocide is honestly deplorable.
I really wish the admins would address it as it is one of the main things holding Hexbear back.
Yup. People do the same for Hasan. He constantly says things that ragebait people so they do way weirder unrelated things like pretend he’s a dog torturer. You’re just implying that pro-palestinian people are transphobes, even more so than zionists. Which is just very strange.
How do you even come to this conclusion
Try reading the thread, I guess. Or like, the rest of the comment you’re quoting.
Literally nothing they have said implies such a thing 🤷♀️
It absolutely does. If the slop-posting of other e-celebs by other communities is not due to transphobia, but anti-zionist people posting her Islamophobic rants is…
I have literally been told itt that being a transphobe is ok as long as you are anti-genocide (specifically, anti-genocide but still pro zionism like Finkelstein).
Cool, I’m not really responsible for what other people say. That doesn’t mean anti-genocide people are transphobes.
Like, what is the point of responding if you’re going to ignore the entire comment you’re replying to?
You could stop responding. Would be better at this point, honestly. You’re already making up strawmen like “you claim that anti-genocide people are transphobes” when nobody said anything like that anywhere. I brought up the example to prove that yes, we do have transmisogynists like @[email protected] on here and they go mask off every time you poke them a little.
My point isn’t to defend Natalie’s takes on Gaza, not only because they are indefensible but because her position on the genocide isn’t even the topic of this thread, it wasn’t the topic of the last contrapoints hate thread three days ago either, it is barely ever brought up in spite of the fact that we collectively tear into her twice a week. My point is that the excessive focus on her is a symptom of hexbears’ transmisogyny problem that nobody except the trans women on this site is ever willing to adress. Stop making up excuses for what is obviously transmisogyny, stop telling trans women that we cannot tell it’s transmisogyny.
You even go out of your way and say “this is the same as people making up lies about Hasan’s dog.” You openly admit that this has reached the point of character assassination where it doesn’t even matter anymore if an accusation is completely fabricated. and where the original problem that made somebody an acceptable target is now only trotted out as a flimsy after-the-fact justification. How am i supposed to treat somebody who thinks that kind of behavior is not only normal, but perfectly acceptable?
Hexbear has a serious casual transphobia problem. This isn’t even the only time it’s happened in the past couple of months, there was all the denial of Lilly Bushnell’s gender as well. Claiming that someone’s transphobia is acceptable just because they oppose genocide is honestly deplorable.
I really wish the admins would address it as it is one of the main things holding Hexbear back.