the guy refuses to even call gaza siege a genocide, supported iraq war, wants more military spending, and amount of people thinking it’s bad around 1%, because some boutique reasons like sturmer must go (replace him with sturmer 2.0). genuinely, what one member swapping to reform even harm, they have super majority in the government.
oh i’m not disputing that he’s absolute filth and that whether he or keith run labour makes very little material difference. but i suppose, in a way, it might be good for burnham to become pm so that labour voters with short memories can see in real-time that burnham is as bad as starmer and perhaps get closer to realising that it’s not just one guy, but the whole of labour who are just as much our class enemy as reform. but idk, maybe i am coping.
the guy refuses to even call gaza siege a genocide, supported iraq war, wants more military spending, and amount of people thinking it’s bad around 1%, because some boutique reasons like sturmer must go (replace him with sturmer 2.0). genuinely, what one member swapping to reform even harm, they have super majority in the government.
oh i’m not disputing that he’s absolute filth and that whether he or keith run labour makes very little material difference. but i suppose, in a way, it might be good for burnham to become pm so that labour voters with short memories can see in real-time that burnham is as bad as starmer and perhaps get closer to realising that it’s not just one guy, but the whole of labour who are just as much our class enemy as reform. but idk, maybe i am coping.